Does the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 Bar Muslims from Holding Public Office?

Such an interpretation of the 1952 law would not only be incorrect, it would betray an egregious ignorance of the U.S. Constitution.


The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 bans Muslims from holding public office in the United States.



For those seeking a legal justification for keeping Muslims out of U.S. politics, the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 has been the go-to law to misrepresent. During legal fights over President Donald Trump’s so-called “Muslim travel ban,” that law was commonly and erroneously cited as an example of a legal precedent that would allow for banning Muslims and other groups from entering the United States.

In August 2018, following Muslim politician Ilhan Omar’s win in a Democratic primary for Minnesota’s Fifth Congressional District, references to the McCarran-Walter Act (frequently referred to incorrectly online as a 1953 act) began appearing on social media in support of the claim that “No Muslims can hold public office within the USA according to this 1952 law.” Some commenters wondered online why the act wasn’t being enforced, posting exhortations such as the following:

The Act, which upheld a controversial quota system for immigration first established in 1924, was passed (over President Truman’s veto ) in the context of Cold War-era fears.

Espionage was a major concern of the era, as was the threat that foreigners might bring radical ideas into the country from outside. And so the sponsors of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, Democrats Senator Pat McCarran of Nevada and Rep. Francis Walter of Pennsylvania, argued that the nation needed a new kind of immigration law for national security purposes.

The 1952 law tweaked but maintained the quotas established by the Immigration Act of 1924. Although it eliminated the racial conditions for citizenship that had long held back Asians, the law established new quotas in a manner that favored Western Europeans. A key provision, however, gave the President the ability to overrule those quotas.

One provision of the law (Chapter 2: Section 212) is most commonly cited by those spreading anti-Muslim rhetoric. That provision allows certain United States government officials to deny entry to anyone deemed to pose a threat to the government, and xenophobic interpretations of the law have simply replaced a previous era’s fear of communism with a contemporary fear of Islam:

Except as otherwise provided in this Act, aliens who are inadmissible under the following paragraphs are ineligible to receive visas and ineligible to be admitted to the United States:

Any alien who a consular officer or the Attorney General knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in any activity a purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force, violence, or other unlawful means.

Asserting that this law bars Muslims from holding office would require several demonstrably false things to be true. First, it would require that the only Muslims in the United States be “aliens” who entered the country as immigrants. Since the 1952 act concerns only foreign nationals seeking to enter the U.S. and/or to obtain visas, it is wholly irrelevant to questions of suitability for public office for those Americans who are both Muslim and resident U.S. citizens.

Second, the notion that this law would be applicable to Muslims at all would require it be demonstrated that the entire Muslim faith, universally, seeks to engage in activities whose “purpose of which is the opposition to, or the control or overthrow of, the Government of the United States by force.”

The McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 allowed the U.S. to deny citizenship to persons belonging to organizations deemed to be a threat to the government. While that singular aspect of the law remains on the books, not one aspect of that law or its successors is concerned with the suitability of any person to hold public office, and therefore the claim that this act bars Muslims from holding office is false.

We note as well that the Constitution is pretty clear on the impermissibility of imposing religious requirements on those seeking public office: “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

  • U.S. State Department.   “The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (The McCarran-Walter Act).”

        Accessed 20 August 2018.

  • Golshan, Tara.   “Ilhan Omar, A Progressive Muslim Woman, Wins Minnesota Primary for Keith Ellison’s House Seat.”

        Vox.   14 August 2018.

  • United States Customs and Immigration Service.   “212 – General Classes of Aliens Ineligible to Receive Visas and Ineligible for Admission; Waivers of Inadmissibility.”

        Accessed 20 August 2018.

  • Pew Research Center.   “U.S. Muslims Concerned About Their Place in Society, But Continue to Believe in the American Dream.”

        26 July 2017.

  • Lipka, Michael.   “Muslims and Islam: Key Findings in the U.S. and Around the World.”

        Pew Research Center.   9 August 2017.

  • United States Constitution.   “Article VI.”

        Accessed 20 August 2018.

Dear Reader, has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation, an effort we could not sustain without support from our audience. Producing reliable fact-checking and thorough investigative reporting requires significant resources. We pay writers, editors, web developers, and other staff who work tirelessly to provide you with an invaluable service: evidence-based, contextualized analysis of facts. Help us keep strong. Make a direct contribution today. Learn More.

Donate with PayPal